Can Catholics Be Democrats?

by Fr. Christian Mathis on October 16, 2012

Yesterday the Huffington Post ran an article concerning comments made by Steve Fitzgerald, a Republican candidate for the Kansas state Senate, which seemed to imply that Catholics have no place in the Democratic Party.

Steve Fitzgerald, a Republican candidate for the Kansas state Senate, is defending his comments last week that Democrats should not be Catholics, saying was trying to tell a Catholic group in Kansas City about the need for the Democratic Party to change.

Fitzgerald, who is challenging state Sen. Kelly Kultala (D-Kansas City), said he told a meeting of the Polish American Club that he believes the country needs two strong political parties, and that the Democratic Party’s national platform has moved away from the views of the Bible and the Catholic Church.

“My main point is that the Democratic platform and policies nationally are an attempt to redefine marriage in effect to say what Christ has said about marriage is a lie,” Fitzgerald told HuffPost. “Christ said marriage is between one man and one woman and the Democratic platform said that it’s not true. So therefore, my point was that one cannot support the Democratic platform and be a follower of Christ.”

Attendees of the Polish American Club meeting, including Kultala, said the 25 audience members were largely silent during Fitzgerald’s presentation. Walter Kaszko, the club’s president, said Fitzgerald’s presentation differed from those of other candidates in that it centered on social and religious issues. The group — which has been meeting monthly in the same basement room since 1925 — used the presentations to determine which candidate it would back in the upcoming election. The club, which has trended Democratic since it’s founding, backed Kultala over Fitzgerald.

Fitzgerald said he was not surprised that some in the audience interpreted his remarks as meaning he believed Catholics should not be Democrats, but argued that he was trying to make a broader point.

“The contention that I said that one cannot be Catholic or Christian and a Democrat is not an unreasonable summation of what I actually said,” Fitzgerald said. “My actual message was fix the party or leave.” (read the rest here)

In one sense I completely agree with Fitzgerald’s assertion that one cannot be Catholic while being a Democrat. This being said, I would also say one cannot be a Catholic while being a Republican. The Kansas Senate candidate is absolutely correct in pointing out that the Democratic Party supports policies which are in direct opposition to the teachings of the Catholic Church. Faithful Catholics cannot support the practice of abortion and should see it as their duty to stand up for religious freedom. But if we are going to use a standard that claims one cannot support a party that does not fall in line with Catholic beliefs, we must admit that the Republican Party also falls short, as does every other political party. Perhaps it would be better to say that our primary allegiance as Catholics is not to a political party, but to God.

 

Those of you who know me, know that I am a political junkie. I love to watch presidential debates, keep up with what is going on in congress, and even to study the history of how politics has formed our nation. One thing that I despise about politics, however, is the more and more blatant dishonesty from politicians. Near the end of last week’s Vice Presidential debate, Vice President Joe Biden remarked, “With regard to the assault on the Catholic Church, let me make it absolutely clear. No religious institution — Catholic or otherwise, including Catholic social services, Georgetown Hospital, Mercy Hospital, any hospital — none has to either refer contraception, none has to pay for contraception, none has to be a vehicle to get contraception in any insurance policy they provide. That is a fact. That is a fact.” No, Mr. Vice President, that is not a fact, it is a lie.

 

But let’s turn back to Mr. Fitzgerald. He is a good example of a more subtle form of dishonesty that, in my opinion, has been alive and well in the Republican Party for many years. The argument goes something like this. The Democrats support abortion. Catholics are against abortion. Abortion is really, really bad. If Catholics vote for Democrats they are supporting abortion. Republicans are against abortion and therefore the Catholic party. Vote for us. My problem with this argument is that it is also a lie. First of all, Republicans who have been elected to office have not changed much of the law when it comes to abortion. They, like the Democrats, will say and do things which they believe will help them be elected to office. We can take Rep. Paul Ryan as an example. He recently altered his position on abortion to include exceptions, so as to fall in line with his running mate. But the bigger piece of dishonesty is the fact that there are many things the Republican Party supports that are not in line with Catholic teaching that the party has no intention of changing. Sharing Catholic values is bigger than simply being against abortion and same sex marriage.

 

One of the Church’s greatest gifts is that our unity does not originate from a political party, nationality, race or culture. Our unity comes from God who created us all in his image. We should not see ourselves primarily as Democrats or Republicans, but as Catholics.  As such, we are called upon to be witnesses to the truth to all political parties. My hope is that Catholics will take an active part in the political process, by continuing to learn about our faith, about the positions of candidates of both parties and how their actions as our representatives will effect the things we most value. I also hope that we elect those who will best represent those values. Our responsibility doesn’t end when we walk out of the voting booth, however. No matter who is elected, it is our duty to continue to challenge our leaders to support the values that will preserve the dignity of all people.

Related Posts:

  • FranRossiSzpylczyn

    If we are too extreme, one cannot be human and Catholic! Yet we must be Catholic where we are, holding to our principles and living the Gospel in a particular way.

    What bothers me is the assertion, which you put to rest, that somehow Republicans are more Catholic. Both parties have moral challenges all over the place; particularly so in the abortion conversation for the Dems.

    I am a political junkie too – but I will be very glad when this election is over, and I will probably be either unhappy or very unhappy at that time. Neither choice makes me feel so great.

    Thanks for your candor here – I appreciate what you have said.

  • Curt

    I agree with your comments but always find myself searching for the lesser of two less-than-ideal options. In recent years that has been whichever candidates come closest to supporting life and Catholic teachings. I would point out that at the Tennessee state level republicans have made some fairly dramatic changes in the past two years, one of which resulted in closure of a Knoxville abortion clinic this year.

  • http://www.blessedisthekingdom.com Fr. Christian Mathis

    Thanks for the comment Curt. Just to clarify, I realize that the Republican party in recent years has done more, especially on our local level, to fight for life. Even on the national level there are notable accomplishments. My observation, however, is that these national accomplishments were due to “a few good men”, rather than the lip service that many who are elected give. Thanks for your devoted service to the cause of life.

  • Centavoaqui

    I am voting for Pedro… The republicans are also not in line with Catholic social justice issues.

  • Ironic Catholic

    Why, you’ve been reading Faithful Citizenship! (that’s a compliment!)

    To be fair to Ryan, Catholics are allowed to make incremental changes when the “big change” cannot be done. He likely sees his position in this light. Such a change in abortion law on the federal level would indeed be huge.

    Me, I’m writing in a third candidate. :(

  • http://fathershelton.blogspot.com/ Father Shelton

    “Republicans who have been elected to office have not changed much of the law when it comes to abortion”. Yes, and as far as the Supreme Court is concerned, weren’t all the Roe vs. Wade justices Republican appointees? And the majority are Republican appointees today.

  • MoreEntitlementsPlease

    Political junkie? Apparently you missed the whole partial birth abortion (late term abortion) debate and legislative effort during the past two decades. An effort led and passed by Republicans under President Bush and opposed by almost all Democrats, including President Clinton who vetoed it twice during his Presidency and President Obama who voted against similar legislation as an Illinois Senator. Apparently you’ve also missed the seemingly endless attempts by Republicans nationwide to restrict abortion through legislation by requiring parental notification for minors, mandatory ultrasounds, mandatory waiting periods, opposing the “morning after pill”….the list goes on and on and on and ALL of these efforts were opposed by Democrats, the President and his allies in the pro-choice community. A simple Google search would provide you with truckloads of information on this. Ask yourself this – if Republicans aren’t fighting as hard as ever against abortion, then why are the leading pro-choice special interest groups such as NARAL, NOW and others telling women that a woman’s right to chose is under attack like never before? Is this “war on women” that we keep hearing about from Democrats just something that’s been made up? By the way, these militant pro-choice groups give almost all of their political contributions to Democrats and have actively campaigned for the re-election of President Obama and his army of pro-choice Democrats in Congress.

    Let me just say I’m not impressed with your political analysis on this issue, and then let me continue….

    So you want to equate a candidate who opposes abortion except in cases of rape, incest and when the life of the mother is threatened to a President and a political arty who support abortion on demand, for any reason, from conception to birth? Again, for emphasis – we’re talking about a President and a political party with a platform that supports abortion rights, on demand, for the entire duration of a 9 month pregnancy regardless of the woman’s ability to pay (i.e. taxpayer funded abortion). It’s not only evil, it’s sick.

    On to the Supreme Court…..there are glaring differences between the Justices nominated by President Bush and those nominated by Presidents Clinton and Obama on the issue of abortion. If you want the culture of abortion future entrenched into the laws of the land then let Obama send a few more pro-choice Justices to the bench.

    Thankfully this election cycle there are finally some US Bishops doing right by the Church and taking a stand against what is the most pro-abortion President and Democrat party in the history of this country. How any Catholic could vote for President Obama given his absolute extreme position on abortion, his administration’s frontal assault on all US Catholic institutions via the Affordable Care Act and it’s mandatory contraception and “morning after pill” coverage, and his official endorsement of gay marriage is really beyond me. Those Catholics who do so get what they deserve.

  • http://www.blessedisthekingdom.com Fr. Christian Mathis

    No I didn’t miss the partial birth abortion debate, nor the unborn victims act. What I did miss was how more than that was not accomplished with regards to abortion during the years of 2000-2006 when Republicans controlled the House, Senate and the White House. Near the end of that run Bush also appointed Roberts and Alito to the Supreme Court.

    My point in this post is not to say that Democrats are going to suddenly do an about face when it comes to abortion, but rather to say that there is not a “Catholic” political party. Romney himself has said during his campaign that there is no anti-abortion legislation that he will make part of his policy if elected. His running mate, who used to take the Catholic position against all cases of abortion, has changed his mind in order that he not contradict Romney’s views on the matter. Romney seems very much like Al Gore when it comes to this issue. He was pro-choice when running in Massachusetts, and now that he is running for national office is Pro-life. Gore went the opposite direction, but both of them show a tendency just to say whatever people want to hear.

    Catholics are called upon to know our faith and to evaluate the candidates based upon that faith. My hope is that we will continue to challenge both parties when it comes to following our values.

  • MoreEntitlementsPlease

    As I’m sure you know, it takes 60 votes in the US Senate to break a filibuster and pass legislation except in the case of some budget bills that can be passed under Reconciliation. When Democrats lost their filibuster-proof 60 vote majority in the Senate after Scott Brown (R) defeated Martha Coakley (D in 2010 and replaced the deceased Ted Kennedy, Democrats resorted to Reconciliation to ram through Obamacare and begin their assault on religious freedom, and the Catholic Church in particular. Unlike Democrats, Republicans never had a filibuster-proof, 60-vote majority in the US Senate under Bush. The best they had was a 55-45 majority. The Partial Birth Abortion ban passed in 2000 and signed by Bush was passed with support from 49 out of 55 Republican Senators and 14 out of 45 Democrat Senators. Three socially liberal Republicans from the Northeast joined the vast majority of Demcorats is opposing the ban. Three more socially liberal Republicans (2 from the Northeast and 1 from Florida) were gutless and abstained from voting.

    Had Democrats had their way, the brutal and disgusting act of partial birth abortion would still be legal, alive and well.

    The abortion battle has been waged nationwide at the federal and state level. As you know, the 2010 election swept hoards of socially conservative, tea-party Republicans into office at all levels of government. These Republicans have mounted an assault of abortion that has the pro-choice community up in arms. Earlier this year, militant pro-choice group NARAL reported that Republicans had launched some 235 bills in legislatures across the country to restrict abortion. Reference: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/story/2012-04-25/states-anti-abortion-legislation/54538866/1

    Regarding Paul Ryan – his career battle against abortion is nothing short of admirable. I’ll take him over Joe Biden and Barack Obama any day of the week and twice on Sundays. Reference: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/08/paul-ryan-cosponsored-all-most-extreme-anti-abortion-bills

  • http://www.blessedisthekingdom.com Fr. Christian Mathis

    Yes, I am aware of the requirement of 60 votes to break a filibuster and I consider it appalling that both parties continue to use a rule that was certainly not meant to be used in this fashion. I am hoping that eventually one of the parties will have the guts to make the unpopular, and no doubt difficult, move to change the Senate rules so that bills can pass on a simple majority. It’s sad that this seems to be necessary.

    I agree with you that Paul Ryan has a laudable record when it comes to confronting abortion, but I still find it sad that he was willing to compromise the Catholic position for political gain. His position is better than what the Democrats propose and the record of his running mate.

    Thanks again for your comments. My initial thought with regard to this post, however, is that there is no “Catholic” political party in the United States. I still feel this is the case. It makes me sad that so many are left to vote for the lesser of evils, rather than to confidently vote for a candidate who will support the majority of our values as Catholics.

Previous post:

Next post:

Copyright 2012, Blessed is the Kingdom